Read selected decisions made in other jurisdictions, which are relevant to the Children's Court.
Page ContentsQuickly navigate to each section of this page by clicking one of the links below
DPP v Kirk Reese (a pseudonym)  VCC 1670
Catchwords: Criminal law – application for judge alone fitness investigation and special hearing – Part 11 of the Crimes (Mental Impairment and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997 –accused unfit to be tried – consent of both parties to judge alone special hearing – interests of justice – delay – unfit young accused awaiting trial – no complex or contentious issues –application for judge alone special hearing granted.
19 October 2020View the decision here
LS v CDPP
Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW — Appeal from decisions of President of the Children’s Court — Appeal against conviction on 2 charges and sentence on all charges — State and federal sexual offences committed against appellant’s baby daughter — Whether general deterrence relevant to sentencing a child for federal offences — Appellant convicted and sentenced to 12 months’ detention in a Youth Justice Centre — Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) ss 49A, 49D, 49F — Criminal Code (Cth) s 474.20(1)(a)(ii), s 474.19(1)(a)(ii) — Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) ss 16A, 20C — Children, Youth and Families Act 2005 (Vic) s 362 — CNK v R (2011) 32 VR 641 — DPP v Hutchinson (a pseudonym)  VSCA 153.
10-Aug-20Download a copy of the decision here
Secretary of the DHHS v Children's Court of Victoria & Emily Powell (a pseudonym)  VSC 144
Catchwords: Appeal - Children's Court of Victoria - Interim accommodation order - Whether in best interest of child to remain with mother - Whether unacceptable risk of harm to child - Unacceptable risk not made out - Whether COVID-19 pandemic creates unacceptable risk to child's best interests if child does not remain with mother - Child to remain with mother - Children, Youth and Families Act 2005 (Vic) ss 8, 10, 271, 276.
Justice John Dixon J
27 March 2020
PT v Director of Public Prosecutions  VCC 836
Catchwords: Criminal Law - Applicant child charged with a Category A serious youth offence of aggravated home invasion for which he was refused a summary hearing and determination in the Children’s Court pursuant to s. 356(6) of the Children, Youth and Families Act 2005 (CYFA) - Applicant now seeks an order pursuant to s.168 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (CPA) for the transfer of the charge to the Children’s Court – Onus on applicant under s. 168A(1) to show there is a substantial and compelling reason why the charge should be heard and determined summarily – In determining whether the threshold test is satisfied the Court must, under s. 168A(2), have regard to the intention of Parliament that a charge for a category A serious youth offence should not normally be heard and determined summarily – Application of the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 – Application for transfer refused.
His Honour Judge Gamble
22 May 2019
ZD v Secretary to the Department of Health and Human Services  VSC 806
Catchwords: Courts – Appeal from decision of Children’s Court Magistrate in respect of condition to vaccinate children imposed in the best interests of the child as part of interim accommodation order pursuant to s 263(7) of the Children Youth and Families Act 2005 – Whether decision beyond power or otherwise misconceived nature and scope of power – Whether power extends to making decisions with significant long-term consequences for child – Appeal dismissed. HUMAN RIGHTS – Best interests of the child – Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 considered. Statutory Interpretation – Meaning of ‘any condition’ for the purpose of s 263(7) of the Children Youth and Families Act 2005.
Justice JA Osborn
22 December 2017